Design of floors for vibration quiz

From SteelConstruction.info
Revision as of 12:11, 12 March 2019 by Chris.dolling@steelconstruction.org (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Please answer the following 10 multiple choice questions, then click 'submit' to check the result. The pass mark for a CPD certificate is 8 out of 10, and you may retake the quiz...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Please answer the following 10 multiple choice questions, then click 'submit' to check the result. The pass mark for a CPD certificate is 8 out of 10, and you may retake the quiz as many times as you wish, but the questions will vary! Please note that one, two, three or all of the possible answers presented for each question may be right, and to gain a mark for that question all correct answers must be identified.

Good luck

Design of floors for vibration

What is a reasonable frequency range caused by walking?

2 Hz to 3 Hz
1 Hz to 2 Hz
2.8 Hz to 3.2 Hz
1.8 Hz to 2.2 Hz

A designer has conservatively assessed a floor plate for an office of 18m x 30m. The structural grid is 9m x 7.5m and the plans show a central corridor running the length of the building. The target response factor is 8, but initial calculations indicate a response factor of 9. Which of the following strategies could the designer use to potentially reduce the initial response factor calculated?

The source of excitation (the corridor) is close to the column line, and so a µe value less than 1 is possible
Replace normal weight concrete for the composite slab with lightweight concrete
Reduce the walking path and resonance build-up by introducing doors in the corridor
If the axis of vibration is known use the appropriate frequency weighting curve

For a traditional composite floor system, comprising a slab continuous over a number of secondary beams that in turn are supported by primary beams, what two mode shapes should the designer consider if analysing by hand?

Slab mode
Secondary beam mode
Simply supported beam mode
Primary beam mode

No floor structure, and no single element within that floor structure, should have a fundamental frequency less than what?

8.4hz
5hz
4hz
3hz

When assessing vibrations in a floor, appropriate acceptance criteria can be referenced from where (more than one may apply)?

BS 5950: Structural use of steelwork in building
BS 6472: Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings
SCI publication P354 “Design of Floors for Vibration: a New Approach”
BS 6399: Loadings for buildings

An engineer has designed a floor plate to a response factor of 7. The floor comprises secondary beams at 3m centres acting compositely with a 140mm composite deck. The secondary beam has a frequency of 4.5Hz. The main contractor is having difficulty in getting materials into what is a congested site, and has asked if it would be acceptable to replace the composite deck with a lightweight timber joist floor. He submits calculations that demonstrate that the same beam acting non-compositely is perfectly adequate in terms of strength, and achieves the same frequency of 4.5Hz due to a reduction in dead load of 75%. How should the engineer respond?

As long as the beam is satisfactory in terms of strength and the beam frequency remains the same or higher, then that proposal is perfectly acceptable.
Whilst your calculations demonstrate that the beam can support the change in loads, and that both the beam and system frequency are satisfactory, I have concerns about the vibration performance of the floor. The dead load of the floor construction has been reduced by 75%. Newton’s second law (acceleration = Force/Mass) suggests a four fold increase in the accelerations due to this significant reduction in dead load. The response factor has gone up from 7 to 28, which is well in excess of current practice.
No, the drawings clearly state the form of construction required.
Your proposal is acceptable provided you can offer a saving to the Client and accept design liability for your proposals.

According to SCI’s P354, “Design of Floors for Vibration: A New Approach”, the recommended response factor or multiplying factor for an office is?

2
4
6
8

In respect of Vibration Dose Values (VDV’s), which statements are correct?

VDV’s provide a mechanism for taking account of the intermittent nature of vibrations
VDV’s can be used for operating theatres in hospitals
VDV’s are generally used when calculated response factors are within the limits of multiplying factors for continuous vibrations
Guidance on the use of VDV’s can be found in BS 6472 and P354

The frequency of an element or system is inversely proportional to the square root of the deflection. On what loading is the deflection based in the UK?

Dead load + 30% of the imposed load
Dead load + 10% of the imposed load
Dead load only
Dead load + imposed load

Which of the statements below are true with respect to the Variable Dose Value (VDV) method?

VDV’s can be used for hospital operating theatres
They relate the response factor or multiplying factor to the intermittency of vibration
VDV’s are independent of walking path length
Give the number of times that an activity can take place in a given exposure period